Impact · Analysis
What the guaranteed income pilots actually showed
For a decade, guaranteed income pilots handed cash directly to people who needed it and tracked what happened. The results from Stockton, Compton and Denver keep pointing the same way: people spent the money on necessities, employment often rose, and stress and anxiety fell. The argument is no longer that we need more research. It's that we already know enough to move money from research budgets into people's hands.
Key facts
- Stockton SEED gave 125 residents $500 a month for 24 months; full-time employment among recipients rose from 28% to 40% in the first year.
- More than 60% of SEED spending went to food, utilities and household goods; under 1% went to tobacco or alcohol.
- Denver Basic Income reported that about half of participants in higher tiers moved into stable housing within 10 months.
- Compton Pledge recipients reported improved mental health, financial stability and reduced anxiety.
- Mayors for a Guaranteed Income now tracks over 100 pilot programs across the United States.
Stockton SEED: the pilot that changed the conversation
The Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration (SEED) launched in 2019 under Mayor Michael Tubbs. It gave 125 residents of Stockton, California $500 a month for 24 months, with no strings attached. The SEED program was designed as a real test: recipients were randomly selected, with a control group for comparison.
The first-year results upended the loudest objection to cash transfers. Full-time employment among SEED recipients rose from 28% to 40% in twelve months — a larger gain than the control group saw. People used the stability to find work, finish training, or take risks a bus fare and a full stomach finally allowed. And the money went where critics said it wouldn't: over 60% of spending went to food, utilities and household goods, and under 1% to tobacco or alcohol. Recipients also reported measurably lower depression, anxiety and financial stress.
Compton Pledge: cash plus community
The Compton Pledge sent recurring cash to roughly 800 low-income residents of Compton, California, prioritizing undocumented and formerly incarcerated people who are usually excluded from aid. Participants reported improved mental health, better financial stability and reduced anxiety about making ends meet. The lesson: even modest, predictable cash changes how people plan — and whom a safety net actually reaches.
Denver Basic Income: housing outcomes, not just spending
The Denver Basic Income Project tested cash transfers for people experiencing homelessness, giving participants up to $12,000 over a year across different payment structures. Its reports found that roughly half of participants in the higher-payment tiers moved into stable housing within about 10 months, alongside improvements in food security and mental health. When the question is "will people spend it on rent or on vices," Denver answered: rent.
The pattern across pilots
Mayors for a Guaranteed Income, the network co-founded by Michael Tubbs, now tracks over 100 pilot programs. The pattern repeats: cash goes to necessities, work doesn't fall (it often rises), and the biggest measurable effects are on stress, mental health and housing stability. These aren't cherry-picked outliers; they're the consistent findings of randomized and well-tracked programs across very different cities and populations.
Why this justifies moving money from research to people
Every new pilot costs money to design, administer and evaluate — money that could have been in someone's pocket. At some point, "we need more research" becomes a way of delaying a conclusion we don't like. The pilots have run. The data is in. People spent responsibly, worked more, and felt better. The honest next step is to shift budgets from studying poverty toward ending it: fund direct cash at scale, keep evaluation lightweight, and let the results we already have justify the transfers we already know work.
C∞A∞I∞O builds tools for mission-driven groups, and we're planning projects in housing and relief, including microhom.us. See each one and its real status on our Fund the Impact work page.
FAQ
Did guaranteed income pilots reduce employment?
No. In Stockton SEED, full-time employment among recipients rose from 28% to 40% in a year, outpacing the control group. Denver Basic Income reported similar gains among people experiencing homelessness. Source
What did recipients spend the money on?
Mostly necessities. In Stockton SEED, over 60% of spending went to food, utilities and household goods, and under 1% to tobacco or alcohol. Source
Did guaranteed income affect stress and mental health?
Yes. Stockton SEED reported reduced depression and anxiety among recipients, and Compton Pledge participants reported improved mental health and financial stability. Source
Where can I read the original pilot reports?
Stockton SEED results are published by the Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration, Denver Basic Income by the Denver Basic Income Project, and over 100 pilots are tracked by Mayors for a Guaranteed Income.
Want a donate page your board and donors can actually read? Tell us about your organization by email at